<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Out with the old&#8230;</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.mistersnappy.co.uk/2009/12/10/out-with-the-old/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.mistersnappy.co.uk/2009/12/10/out-with-the-old/</link>
	<description>intermittent since 2001</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Sat, 09 Jul 2011 10:01:38 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.2.1</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: nick holmes</title>
		<link>http://www.mistersnappy.co.uk/2009/12/10/out-with-the-old/comment-page-1/#comment-148</link>
		<dc:creator>nick holmes</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 04 Jan 2010 09:29:17 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://mistersnappy.wordpress.com/2009/12/10/out-with-the-old/#comment-148</guid>
		<description>I too am a fan of the old sherbet fountain, and am appalled at its loss of classic packaging in favour of &#039;health and safety gone mad&#039;.

So you never said whether the new packaging made any difference to the taste experience. Was the licorice fresher, as designed. Did you, even for one second, consider using the resealable lid?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I too am a fan of the old sherbet fountain, and am appalled at its loss of classic packaging in favour of &#8216;health and safety gone mad&#8217;.</p>
<p>So you never said whether the new packaging made any difference to the taste experience. Was the licorice fresher, as designed. Did you, even for one second, consider using the resealable lid?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

